H.R. 5 - Student Success Act (Status)
Rep. Kline, John [R-MN-2]
(Introduced 02/03/2015)
(Introduced 02/03/2015)
WHAT IS GOING ON WITH H.R.5 - Contact the House Committee on Education and the Workforce DIRECTLY!
CLICK HERE
CLICK HERE
WHO VOTED In Favor of H.R. 5 - Student Success Act ???
WHO is Trying to Sell Out WE THE PEOPLE's CHILDREN to COMMUNISM??? Listen to Lily Tang Williams with Tom Lacovara CLICK HERE |
Follow Charlotte Iserbyt's Blog CLICK HERE
|
2 URGENT ACTIONS NEEDED
ACTION #1 - Federal bill HR5 - Student Success Act - Rep. Kline - is a boondoggle worse than NCLB and RTTT. It has passed out of committee and will go to the floor for a vote as early as Tuesday, February 24, 2015. We MUST stop this bill from passing. Alexander is already redoing his bill in the Senate to please Obama so he doesn't go through with his threat to veto. This act alone should be all the warning we need.
For those of you that missed the call with Anita Hoge I am attaching a link so you can hear the information she has revealed about HR5. I am also attaching a copy of HR5 with sections discussed on the call highlighted for your convenience. I have highlighted other things I noticed but take note to Pg. 552-553, Pg. 488 and Pages 78-80.
Follow the Bill... (Sponsored by John Kline)
|
Here is a short 11 minute excerpt from the conference call to share with state and federal legislators or for yourself if you don't have time to listen to the long conference call.
CONFERENCE CALL ARCHIVE |
EXCERPT
Here is a quick read on some of the egregious things in HR5. Pick a couple points and let your US Rep. know you want them to vote NO on HR5. Let them know we are watching this vote with close scrutiny. |
ARTICLE
Here is a long Press Release just sent by Anita Hoge. The more we look the worse it gets. |
PRESS RELEASE
Go to POPVOX.com and OPPOSE HR5. If you are not registered on this site I highly recommend that you take the few minutes to register then OPPOSE HR5. This website sends and immediate message to your US Representative or Senator. |
PLEASE SHARE THIS FAR AND WIDE WITH EVERYONE YOU KNOW.
This is CRITICAL. Although they try to make this bill sound oh so nice if passed the federal government will own education and the souls of our children. Private, religious and home school will not protect our kids if this bill is passed. It is obvious that once again our elected officials have not read the very bills they are supporting. If they read this bill then they are complicit in this assault against American children.
ACTION #2 - THE TENNESSEE HOUSE EDUCATION COMMITTEES ARE HOSTING SOCIALIST MARC TUCKER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 24TH TO TESTIFY IN SUPPORT OF COMMON CORE. PLEASE EMAIL AND CALL EVERY MEMBER OF THE TWO EDUCATION COMMITTEES. I HAVE PROVIDED A LIST FOR YOU TO COPY AND PASTE AND A SPREADSHEET WITH THE PHONE NUMBERS. Let them know we are not happy that a man such as Marc Tucker is coming to testify. And why is there no one speaking for the other side of the issue? WE WANT EQUAL TIME. DR. CHRIS TIENKEN
or DR. YONG ZHAO have agreed to come to Tennessee and testify on behalf of our side of this issue. Marc Tucker is evil and has been working since the Clinton administration to nationalize education. He believes American education should be modeled after the system used in Socialist/Communist countries. The Foreward of his new book (Surpassing Shanghai) was written by Linda Darling-Hammon the master mind behind CSCOPE and Smarter Balance. She was Bill Ayers choice for Secretary of Education and he was VERY upset when President Obama selected Duncan over Darling-Hammond. Please see the attached article about Marc Tucker. IF YOU CAN MAKE IT TO NASHVILLE ON TUESDAY PLEASE PUT ON YOUR ANTI COMMON CORE T SHIRTS OR PUT A PATCH ON YOUR SHIRT TO LET THEM KNOW YOU ARE THERE AGAINST COMMON CORE. THE HEARING IS AT 10:30 CST. and again at 12:00pm CST. ROOM HHR16.
TAKE ACTION !!!_NOW_!!!
Florida YOUR U.S. House of Representatives
Representative Jeff Miller R-01
202-225-4136 jeffmiller.house.gov facebook.com/RepJeffMiller @repjeffmiller @myfloridahouse.gov |
Representative Gwen Graham D-02
202-225-5235 graham.house.gov facebook.com/RepGwenGraham @gwenforcongress @myfloridahouse.gov |
Representative Ted Yoho R-03
202-225-5744 yoho.house.gov facebook.com/CongressmanTedYoho @RepTedYoho @myfloridahouse.gov |
Representative Ander Crenshaw R-04
202-225-2501 crenshaw.house.gov Congressman-Ander-Crenshaw @AnderCrenshaw @myfloridahouse.gov |
Representative Corrine Brown D-05
202-225-0123 corrinebrown.house.gov facebook.com/congresswomanbrown @repcorrinebrown @myfloridahouse.gov |
Representative Ron DeSantis R-06
202-225-2706 desantis.house.gov facebook.com/RepDeSantis @RepDeSantis @myfloridahouse.gov |
Representative John L. Mica R-07
202-225-4035 mica.house.gov facebook.com/JohnMica @micaforcongress @RepJohnMica @myfloridahouse.gov |
Representative Bill Posey R-08
202-225-3671 posey.house.gov facebook.com/bill.posey15 @congbillposey @myfloridahouse.gov |
Representative Alan Grayson D-09
202-225-9889 grayson.house.gov facebook.com/alangrayson @AlanGrayson @myfloridahouse.gov |
Representative Daniel Webster R-10
202-225-2176 webster.house.gov facebook.com/RepWebster @RepWebster @myfloridahouse.gov |
Representative Richard Nugent R-11
202-225-1002 nugent.house.gov facebook.com/RepRichNugent @RepRichNugent @myfloridahouse.gov |
Representative Gus M. Bilirakis R-12
202-225-5755 bilirakis.house.gov facebook.com/GusBilirakis @RepGusBilirakis @myfloridahouse.gov |
Representative David Jolly R-13
202-225-5961 jolly.house.gov facebook.com/repdavidjolly @USRepDavidJolly @myfloridahouse.gov |
Representative Kathy Castor D-14
202-225-3376 castor.house.gov facebook.com/USRepKathyCastor @USRepKCastor @myfloridahouse.gov |
Representative Dennis Ross R-15
202-225-1252 dennisross.house.gov facebook.com/dennis.ross.376 @RepDennisRoss @myfloridahouse.gov |
Representative Vern Buchanan R-16
202-225-5015 buchanan.house.gov facebook.com/CongressmanBuchanan @VernBuchanan @myfloridahouse.gov |
Representative Thomas J. Rooney R-17
202-225-5792 rooney.house.gov facebook.com/reptomrooney @TomRooney @myfloridahouse.gov |
Representative Patrick Murphy D-18
202-225-3026 patrickmurphy.house.gov facebook.com/CongressmanPatrickMurphy @RepMurphyFL @myfloridahouse.gov |
Representative Curt Clawson R-19
202-225-2536 clawson.house.gov facebook.com/ClawsonTheOutsider @RepCurtClawson @myfloridahouse.gov |
Representative Alcee L. Hastings D-20
202-225-1313 alceehastings.house.gov Congressman-Alcee-L-Hastings @RepHastingsFL @myfloridahouse.gov |
Representative Ted Deutch D-21
202-225-3001 teddeutch.house.gov facebook.com/CongressmanTedDeutch @RepTedDeutch @myfloridahouse.gov |
Representative Lois Frankel D-22
202-225-9890 frankel.house.gov facebook.com/RepLoisFrankel @RepLoisFrankel @myfloridahouse.gov |
Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz D-23
202-225-7931 wassermanschultz.house.gov facebook.com/RepDWS @RepDWStweets @myfloridahouse.gov |
Representative Frederica Wilson D-24
202-225-4506 wilson.house.gov facebook.com/RepWilson @RepWilson @myfloridahouse.gov |
Representative Ileana Ros-Lehtinen R-27
202-225-3931
ros-lehtinen.house.gov
facebook.com/iroslehtinen
@RosLehtinen
EMAIL:
[email protected]
Chief of Staff - [email protected]
Deputy Director - [email protected]
Legislative Director - [email protected]
Senior Legislative Assistant - [email protected]
Legislative Assistant - [email protected]
Legislative Correspondent - [email protected]
Communications Assistant - [email protected]
Staff Assistant/Intern Coordinator - [email protected]
Deputy Chief of Staff - [email protected]
Communications Director - [email protected]
Congressional Aide - [email protected]
Congressional Aide - [email protected]
Congressional Aide - [email protected]
Congressional Aide - [email protected]
Congressional Aide - [email protected]
Congressional Aide - [email protected]
Congressional Aide - [email protected]
202-225-3931
ros-lehtinen.house.gov
facebook.com/iroslehtinen
@RosLehtinen
EMAIL:
[email protected]
Chief of Staff - [email protected]
Deputy Director - [email protected]
Legislative Director - [email protected]
Senior Legislative Assistant - [email protected]
Legislative Assistant - [email protected]
Legislative Correspondent - [email protected]
Communications Assistant - [email protected]
Staff Assistant/Intern Coordinator - [email protected]
Deputy Chief of Staff - [email protected]
Communications Director - [email protected]
Congressional Aide - [email protected]
Congressional Aide - [email protected]
Congressional Aide - [email protected]
Congressional Aide - [email protected]
Congressional Aide - [email protected]
Congressional Aide - [email protected]
Congressional Aide - [email protected]
Tennessee
Chinese American Immigrant for Liberty by Lily Tang Williams ..........MORE Information on Lily Tang Williams
To whom this may concern,
Tomorrow H.R.5 Student Success Act will be voted on. PLEASE I would like to request you vote NO on this bill.
The reasons I would like to request the vote of NO are the following:
HR 5 is a Constitutional Crisis in the Making.
The passage of Representative Kline's bill out of committee to be voted on by the entire House of Representatives by February 24 PLEASE Note "NO". The HR 5 Reauthorization of ESEA, amending No Child Left Behind, must be stopped because the provisions inherent in this legislation are egregious and lack Constitutional authority. Passage of H.R. 5 will bring about the destruction of the United States system of public education as well as the radical transformation of representative government both at the state and local level.
States' rights issues have NOT been discussed at the hearings. Is each state legislature aware of the fact that there are measures, hidden in federal and state statute, removing their state’s guaranteed rights under the Constitution? Will each state have to amend its own state constitution to comply with HR 5?
Several states have recently added language in their state statutes that in effect cedes jurisdiction to the federal government.
Do states know of the impact of HR 5 legislation and been advised?
Will states have to comply to federal ESEA legislation and future ESEA legislation?
Will each state's Department of Education have to develop and implement Keystone Exams as required by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (Public Law 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425) or any successor statute." (lines 17, 18, 19 )?
For states passing legislation is it written, "they would succumb to ESEA federal law?" ...Example: "Upon the effective date of this act, the State Board of Education shall seek certification from the State Regents for Higher Education that the subject matter standards for English Language Arts and Mathematics which were in place prior to the revisions adopted by the Board in June 2010 are college-and career-ready as defined in the Federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Flexibility document issued by the United States Department of Education."
Which states have codified Common Core through ESEA giving up their state's rights authority by surrendering education and students to federal control?
Is it true Indiana's supposed departure from Common Core in HB 1427, (Sec. 14.5(a) C, page 9) also surrenders its state's rights in order to comply with federal standards? (Quote: "Provides that the state board shall implement educational standards that use the common core standards as the base model for academic standards to the extent necessary to comply with federal standards to receive a Flexibility Waiver.")
Is it true South Carolina's bill, H3893, (Sec 3, section 59-18-325, (C)(1) passed to stop Common Core and the Smarter Balanced Test surrendering its state's rights over education and students to the federal government? Does this law restores Common Core? (Quote: "The summative assessment must assess students in English/language arts and mathematics, including those students as required by the federal Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and by Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. [For purposes of this subsection, 'English/language arts' includes English, reading, and writing skills as required by existing state standards."] NOTE: The existing State standards are Common Core.")
Referencing Washington State Senate Bill 6030, (Sec 6, (4)(a) page 16, lines 17-20): (Quote: "..and shall not conflict with requirements contained in Title I of the federal elementary and secondary education act of 1965, or the requirements of the Carl D. Perkins vocational education 20 act of 1998, each as amended.")
Have states been apprised of the devious design in HR 5 to take away states' rights granted under the 10th Amendment to the Constitution?
Do Representative Kline's hearings discuss the aspect of the "direct student services" that is defined as PUBLIC SCHOOL CHOICE FOR ALL PRIVATE AND RELIGIOUS SCHOOLS? Why have these services NOT been discussed?...services that each private and religious school MUST "provide on an equitable basis" to meet the individual needs of each child who receives a SUPER VOUCHER? Are the states going to require that private or religious schools MUST use "approved academic tutoring services as determined by a provider on a State approved list"? Will schools be subjected to discrimination charges if they deny matriculation of a Title I child even if they cannot financially support the OPEN ENDED direct services mandated in HR 5, as explained even if it bankrupts the school?
Is it true (A Question for Representative Kline) "meaningful choice" is defined as complying to state standards (Common Core) and interventions identified for each "at-risk" child receiving the following services: Special Education, instructional support services, counseling, mentoring, one-to-one tutoring, and other benefits for the Title I child? Why is there wording that mandates that a private or religious school MUST comply with the Civil Rights Act, (the school cannot deny admittance to a Title I choice child) 6504 Rehabilitation Act, Americans with Disabilities Act, (MUST administer services for mental health disabilities), IDEA (MUST administer behavioral screening, response to interventions, positive behavioral interventions and supports, mental health wrap-around, BILLABLE MEDICAID SERVICES, mental health services or specialized student support services), General Education Provisions Act (GEPA).
Does Representative Kline know full well that HR 5 will codify the Family Education Rights in Privacy Act (FERPA). This important Act, as it stands now, has been totally gutted due to President Obama’s Executive Order, EO 12866, January, 2012. FERPA now allows personally identifiable information on the student to be released without informed written parental consent. This personally identifiable information on the students includes anecdotal, psychological observations, analysis, and reeducation interventions in the affective domain by teachers, all tracked and trafficked?
Is it a must private and religious schools provide the following specialized Instructional support on an equitable basis with public school students? 1) Services defined as school counselors, social workers, school psychologists, or other qualified professional personnel providing assessment, diagnosis, counseling education, therapeutic and other necessary services defined in Sec. 602 IDEA, Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, when in fact Common Core has been expanded into the mental health personal trait standards defined as social, emotional, and behavioral weaknesses now coded as a disability? 2) The State Education Agency names an ombudsman, "an official appointed to investigate individuals' complaints against maladministration, especially that of public authorities," for the following equitable services in each private and religious school: 7monitoring and enforcement requirements of private and religious schools, including reeducation in the affective domain. Obviously, under HR 5 the SEA will operate independently with no accountability to the state legislature which has surrendered its authority and responsibility over education and the students?
Referring to the concept of Title I funds that will "follow the child" and the super voucher called "direct student services”: the Title I fund that "follows the child" is going directly to every child, bypassing state government. Is it true... NO ONE at the public hearings explained that CHOICE, TITLE I FUNDS "FOLLOWING THE 'at-risk' CHILD" would be used to destroy the financial base of public schools which have elected school boards and are funded by local tax dollars? Is it a FACT... HR 5 is purposely designed to destroy the traditional public school system?
Is there scores of pages in Representative Kline's bill ESEA legislation that would expand CHARTER SCHOOLS OPERATING WITHOUT BOARDS ELECTED BY THE TAXPAYERS AS THEIR REPRESENTATIVES? IS THIS A SET UP FOR CHARTER SCHOOL TAKEOVER OF ALL EDUCATION with charter school authorizers to control private and religious schools? Has anyone explained HOW these Title I funds "follow" CHOICE, TITLE I "at risk" CHILD will impact the intrusion into private and religious schools, which will be forced into all of the mandates that come with Common Core implementation and EVERY CHILD identified and funded through Title I and thereby subverting the mission of the private and religious school?
Has Representative Kline really crafted HR 5 behind closed doors and put it on the fast track to correspond to the "spitball" known as the ESEA Reauthorization?
PLEASE READ THIS PART CAREFULLY... Is it true Representative Kline's HR 5 when merged with the Senate version of ESEA Re-Authorization will Nationalize Education By Passing Local Control and State Control, Eliminating Local Representative Government, The Hallmark of a FREE SOCIETY?... or...FACT!
Is it true Representative Kline's "super vouchers" cannot buy our children? No government can deny parents their God-given rights over their children. (Pierce vs Sisters, 1925) Is Representative Kline really requiring parents to waive their rights?... Similar to the waivers HR 5 requires of the states? If so, we demand that Representative Kline immediately produce the waiver by which parents would sign their children over to the federal government! Explain that one to GOD...and your own grandchildren.
"The family is the primary society. It does not exist by sufferance of the state." Dr. Charles E. Rice, correspondence February 5, 1996
Dear Reader if you care about a free America, you are obligated to STOP HR 5.
Our children are not "mere creatures of the state." (Pierce vs. Sisters, 1925)
Dear House Representatives PLEASE Vote "NO" on H.R.5 Student Success Act of 2015 to Amend No Child Left Behind LEAVING No Child Left Behind if H.R.5 Passes.
Dear Reader PLEASE contact YOUR House Representative and Request they Vote "NO" on H.R.5 Student Success Act of 2015.
REMEMBER... When YOU Remain Silent YOU Are Telling Government YOU APPROVE of Their Actions. PLEASE Stand Up, Speak UP and Let YOUR Voice Be Heard for YOU and for the Future of ALL Children!
(This letter was a Letter from Anita Hoge to Representative Kline and adjusted to what you have just read. THANK YOU Anita Hoge for Your Wisdom and ALL Your Research!)
Tomorrow H.R.5 Student Success Act will be voted on. PLEASE I would like to request you vote NO on this bill.
The reasons I would like to request the vote of NO are the following:
- HR 5 denies parents their rights over their children. Reference page 488. Reference page 522-555.
- HR 5 legislation creates the radical transformation of tax collection through the assigned destruction and hostile takeover of our local neighborhood schools.
- HR 5 violates states' rights under the United States Constitution.
- HR 5 is designed to destroy local, public neighborhood schools through usurpation of elected school boards' authorities and responsibilities.
- HR 5 will destroy all private education in America, as well, legislating Title I "choice" vouchers that will "follow the child," enforcing HR 5 compliance in EVERY PRIVATE AND RELIGIOUS SCHOOL.
- HR 5 would legislate services to these Title I "choice" children called DIRECT STUDENT SERVICES AS A VOUCHER that must be equitable and comparable to any public school, which is needed to satisfy Common Core.
- HR 5 will destroy representative government, all non-governmental schools, and standardize education across this nation. This overreach of the federal government is in direct violation of our United States Constitution which dictates separation of federal jurisdiction vs. State jurisdiction.
HR 5 is a Constitutional Crisis in the Making.
- HR 5 requires that states legislatively surrender their rights over education in order to receive Title I funds.
- HR 5 removes the parents as the final arbiters in the upbringing of their children, and wrestles control of private and religious education through federal encroachment as explained...
- Quoting from your HR 5 legislation, on page 552, stipulate the criteria for removing the state legislature's constitutional power, rights, and responsibilities as follows: Subpart 4—Restoration of State Sovereignty Over Public Education and Parental Rights Over the Education of Their Children _____________‘‘SEC. 6561. STATES TO RETAIN RIGHTS AND AUTHORITIES THEY DO NOT EXPRESSLY WAIVE. ‘‘(a) RETENTION OF RIGHTS AND AUTHORITIES.— No officer, employee, or other authority of the Secretary shall enforce against an authority of a State, nor shall any authority of a State have any obligation to obey, any requirement imposed as a condition of receiving assistance under a grant program established under this Act, nor shall such program operate within a State, unless the legislature of that State shall have by law expressly approved that program and, in doing so, HAVE waived the State’s rights and authorities to act inconsistently with any requirement that might be imposed by the Secretary as a condition of receiving that assistance." (Emphasis added) _____________"(b) AMENDMENT OF TERMS OF RECEIPT OF FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE An officer, employee, or other authority of the Secretary may release assistance under a grant program established under this Act to a State only after the legislature of the State has by law expressly approved the program (as described in sub- section (a)). This approval may be accomplished by a vote to affirm a State budget that includes the use of such Federal funds and any such State budget must expressly include any requirement imposed as a condition of 3receiving assistance under a grant program established under this Act so that by approving the budget, the State legislature is expressly approving the grant program and, in doing so, waiving the Stateʼs rights and authorities to act inconsistently with any requirement that might be imposed by the Secretary as a condition of receiving that assistance." (Emphasis added)
The passage of Representative Kline's bill out of committee to be voted on by the entire House of Representatives by February 24 PLEASE Note "NO". The HR 5 Reauthorization of ESEA, amending No Child Left Behind, must be stopped because the provisions inherent in this legislation are egregious and lack Constitutional authority. Passage of H.R. 5 will bring about the destruction of the United States system of public education as well as the radical transformation of representative government both at the state and local level.
States' rights issues have NOT been discussed at the hearings. Is each state legislature aware of the fact that there are measures, hidden in federal and state statute, removing their state’s guaranteed rights under the Constitution? Will each state have to amend its own state constitution to comply with HR 5?
Several states have recently added language in their state statutes that in effect cedes jurisdiction to the federal government.
Do states know of the impact of HR 5 legislation and been advised?
Will states have to comply to federal ESEA legislation and future ESEA legislation?
Will each state's Department of Education have to develop and implement Keystone Exams as required by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (Public Law 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425) or any successor statute." (lines 17, 18, 19 )?
For states passing legislation is it written, "they would succumb to ESEA federal law?" ...Example: "Upon the effective date of this act, the State Board of Education shall seek certification from the State Regents for Higher Education that the subject matter standards for English Language Arts and Mathematics which were in place prior to the revisions adopted by the Board in June 2010 are college-and career-ready as defined in the Federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Flexibility document issued by the United States Department of Education."
Which states have codified Common Core through ESEA giving up their state's rights authority by surrendering education and students to federal control?
Is it true Indiana's supposed departure from Common Core in HB 1427, (Sec. 14.5(a) C, page 9) also surrenders its state's rights in order to comply with federal standards? (Quote: "Provides that the state board shall implement educational standards that use the common core standards as the base model for academic standards to the extent necessary to comply with federal standards to receive a Flexibility Waiver.")
Is it true South Carolina's bill, H3893, (Sec 3, section 59-18-325, (C)(1) passed to stop Common Core and the Smarter Balanced Test surrendering its state's rights over education and students to the federal government? Does this law restores Common Core? (Quote: "The summative assessment must assess students in English/language arts and mathematics, including those students as required by the federal Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and by Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. [For purposes of this subsection, 'English/language arts' includes English, reading, and writing skills as required by existing state standards."] NOTE: The existing State standards are Common Core.")
Referencing Washington State Senate Bill 6030, (Sec 6, (4)(a) page 16, lines 17-20): (Quote: "..and shall not conflict with requirements contained in Title I of the federal elementary and secondary education act of 1965, or the requirements of the Carl D. Perkins vocational education 20 act of 1998, each as amended.")
Have states been apprised of the devious design in HR 5 to take away states' rights granted under the 10th Amendment to the Constitution?
Do Representative Kline's hearings discuss the aspect of the "direct student services" that is defined as PUBLIC SCHOOL CHOICE FOR ALL PRIVATE AND RELIGIOUS SCHOOLS? Why have these services NOT been discussed?...services that each private and religious school MUST "provide on an equitable basis" to meet the individual needs of each child who receives a SUPER VOUCHER? Are the states going to require that private or religious schools MUST use "approved academic tutoring services as determined by a provider on a State approved list"? Will schools be subjected to discrimination charges if they deny matriculation of a Title I child even if they cannot financially support the OPEN ENDED direct services mandated in HR 5, as explained even if it bankrupts the school?
Is it true (A Question for Representative Kline) "meaningful choice" is defined as complying to state standards (Common Core) and interventions identified for each "at-risk" child receiving the following services: Special Education, instructional support services, counseling, mentoring, one-to-one tutoring, and other benefits for the Title I child? Why is there wording that mandates that a private or religious school MUST comply with the Civil Rights Act, (the school cannot deny admittance to a Title I choice child) 6504 Rehabilitation Act, Americans with Disabilities Act, (MUST administer services for mental health disabilities), IDEA (MUST administer behavioral screening, response to interventions, positive behavioral interventions and supports, mental health wrap-around, BILLABLE MEDICAID SERVICES, mental health services or specialized student support services), General Education Provisions Act (GEPA).
Does Representative Kline know full well that HR 5 will codify the Family Education Rights in Privacy Act (FERPA). This important Act, as it stands now, has been totally gutted due to President Obama’s Executive Order, EO 12866, January, 2012. FERPA now allows personally identifiable information on the student to be released without informed written parental consent. This personally identifiable information on the students includes anecdotal, psychological observations, analysis, and reeducation interventions in the affective domain by teachers, all tracked and trafficked?
Is it a must private and religious schools provide the following specialized Instructional support on an equitable basis with public school students? 1) Services defined as school counselors, social workers, school psychologists, or other qualified professional personnel providing assessment, diagnosis, counseling education, therapeutic and other necessary services defined in Sec. 602 IDEA, Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, when in fact Common Core has been expanded into the mental health personal trait standards defined as social, emotional, and behavioral weaknesses now coded as a disability? 2) The State Education Agency names an ombudsman, "an official appointed to investigate individuals' complaints against maladministration, especially that of public authorities," for the following equitable services in each private and religious school: 7monitoring and enforcement requirements of private and religious schools, including reeducation in the affective domain. Obviously, under HR 5 the SEA will operate independently with no accountability to the state legislature which has surrendered its authority and responsibility over education and the students?
Referring to the concept of Title I funds that will "follow the child" and the super voucher called "direct student services”: the Title I fund that "follows the child" is going directly to every child, bypassing state government. Is it true... NO ONE at the public hearings explained that CHOICE, TITLE I FUNDS "FOLLOWING THE 'at-risk' CHILD" would be used to destroy the financial base of public schools which have elected school boards and are funded by local tax dollars? Is it a FACT... HR 5 is purposely designed to destroy the traditional public school system?
Is there scores of pages in Representative Kline's bill ESEA legislation that would expand CHARTER SCHOOLS OPERATING WITHOUT BOARDS ELECTED BY THE TAXPAYERS AS THEIR REPRESENTATIVES? IS THIS A SET UP FOR CHARTER SCHOOL TAKEOVER OF ALL EDUCATION with charter school authorizers to control private and religious schools? Has anyone explained HOW these Title I funds "follow" CHOICE, TITLE I "at risk" CHILD will impact the intrusion into private and religious schools, which will be forced into all of the mandates that come with Common Core implementation and EVERY CHILD identified and funded through Title I and thereby subverting the mission of the private and religious school?
Has Representative Kline really crafted HR 5 behind closed doors and put it on the fast track to correspond to the "spitball" known as the ESEA Reauthorization?
PLEASE READ THIS PART CAREFULLY... Is it true Representative Kline's HR 5 when merged with the Senate version of ESEA Re-Authorization will Nationalize Education By Passing Local Control and State Control, Eliminating Local Representative Government, The Hallmark of a FREE SOCIETY?... or...FACT!
Is it true Representative Kline's "super vouchers" cannot buy our children? No government can deny parents their God-given rights over their children. (Pierce vs Sisters, 1925) Is Representative Kline really requiring parents to waive their rights?... Similar to the waivers HR 5 requires of the states? If so, we demand that Representative Kline immediately produce the waiver by which parents would sign their children over to the federal government! Explain that one to GOD...and your own grandchildren.
"The family is the primary society. It does not exist by sufferance of the state." Dr. Charles E. Rice, correspondence February 5, 1996
Dear Reader if you care about a free America, you are obligated to STOP HR 5.
Our children are not "mere creatures of the state." (Pierce vs. Sisters, 1925)
Dear House Representatives PLEASE Vote "NO" on H.R.5 Student Success Act of 2015 to Amend No Child Left Behind LEAVING No Child Left Behind if H.R.5 Passes.
Dear Reader PLEASE contact YOUR House Representative and Request they Vote "NO" on H.R.5 Student Success Act of 2015.
REMEMBER... When YOU Remain Silent YOU Are Telling Government YOU APPROVE of Their Actions. PLEASE Stand Up, Speak UP and Let YOUR Voice Be Heard for YOU and for the Future of ALL Children!
(This letter was a Letter from Anita Hoge to Representative Kline and adjusted to what you have just read. THANK YOU Anita Hoge for Your Wisdom and ALL Your Research!)